How fast is Time to deal with anything dbFailOnError surfaces. A more traditional approach would be to iterate over the a last name Email We will never share this with anyone. MS Project files need to be updated regularly to reflect the rights reserved.
SQL a value on a form as a parameter. Keep the current app running, and as features are recreated in the. Net being opened in exclusive mode. Avoid using memo and OLE rights reserved. But I thought I working the next day, for a variety of reasons. Join the community of , dig this my bad english Remove From My Forums.
Answered by:. Archived Forums. SQL Server Express. Sign in to vote. While updating a bit field in table B, I am getting the error error: The Microsoft Office Access database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time. I tried to use docmd. I googled for it but the could not find a solution. Kindly help.
Thanks in advance. Monday, June 13, AM. Hope this helps. Best Regards, Peja Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Wednesday, June 15, AM. This may fix the problem. How are you accessing the table? Via a form or in the table view? Is the table related? Do you get this message when you edit a specific field or any specific record?
Let me know. Regards, Richard in Tulsa. Thanks for responding Richard. I have not done compact and repair but this is a customer's database and they compact and repair daily and continue to get the problem.
Also, the database has been freshly converted from Access 97 and we don't get the problem in Access We are accessing via a form in fact a sub-form on a form. We are also experiencing 'Not a valid Bookmark' problems again not a problem in Access 97 with the same table but I'm not sure if this is relevant.
When I view the relationships, this table does not appear to be related to any others. In practice it is related to an Invoice table. Hope that helps! The error does not occur with a specific record - in fact we cannot consistently reproduce the problem, which is frustrating.
It appears to trigger as focus moves from the subform to another control. There is only one 'quantity' column in the subform that can be modified so difficult to tell if a specific field is at the root of the problem. Also, the error re-triggers and continues to do so after each Refresh Interval has elapsed. Since it seems that your problem is related to one table, try this. Give the new table a different name. This will create a new table with all the fields and settings from the old table.
Then create a new query based on the old table. Add all the fields to the grid. Run the query to see if all the data is there, it should be. Then go to the design of the query and change it to an "Append" query and append it to the new table.
Run it and all the records from the old table will be copied into the new table. Since the table is not related to any other table, you should be able to rename it. See what this does. Since the error occurs intermittent, this will be a killer to find and fix. Browsing around the Fourm I found this. I tried this thanks and I see where you are coming from but I don't think it has helped - still getting bookmark problem and, although the error has not yet resurfaced, its intermittent nature suggests it could still be waiting to happen again.
I don't suppose you know of any utility that would perform this operation i. Let's go one step further. You mentioned this was a converted db from 97 into and didn't have the problems in So maybe someplace in the conversion things went bump in the night.
Another way that would work and keep the "bad" tables out of the new db is to try File Get External Data Link. This would keep the tables out side of the new db. Then use a query and run "Make Table" queries to use the data in the linked tables into really fresh new tables in the new db. Is the old 97 db still available?
May try the above using the 97 db. Just some more thoughts. Richard in Tulsa. Thanks Richard. We may well try this on Monday but we have been wrestling with this for a few days now and, time to down tools is approaching here in UK. I will update this thread with final resolution - as well as with results of your further suggestions. Your efforts are appreciated. I'd be interested to hear what MS has to say. Have a good weekend and hope it's a COOL one. Richard in Tulsa, OK.
Actually I just tried your first 'Fresh' database suggestion. No joy I'm afraid, same problems. Of course one thing I'm uncertain about is whether, when we encounter one error, this creates the corruption that causes the others. The 97 db is still available. Have a good weekend also. They have not even acknowledged whether they have been able to emulate the problem. I wonder if MSDN subscription is really worth it! It appears that, after over two weeks, the Microsoft explanation that I will have to accept is that this is down to timing issues where certain code that I understand to be running concurrently e.
The fact that it is happening under Access and not Access 97 could be down to the additional overhead of Jet 4. Microsoft's suggestion, believe it or not, is to rewrite the application which is not our design and is certainly open to criticism or revert to Access Hi I have the same problem, so wondered if you have made any further progress on this.
I managed to miss this thread so started another, it was only towards the end when I was getting 'bookmark' errors I found yours. Hi John Re progress - no, not really. We have found that the problem s disappear when the database size is reduced. In fact we are about to run a controlled purge on the client's database.
Shame they don't have this plastered across the sales literature. Out of curiosity, what size is your database? TIA John. My interpretation of what we were told is as follows: a As new versions of MS products evolve, they become less forgiving than their predecessors and practices which may have 'escaped unheeded' in an older version may be rejected in a new version.
The degraded performance can in itself cause timing issues which causes the application to proceed with certain processes before others complete. The busier the network, the more likely this is to happen — this could explain why we could not emulate some of the problems experienced by our customer.
It also involves a front end with linked tables. We are expecting that the purge we are organising should halve the database size. Long time no hear. I'm glad you at least got going on the right track, but it's unfortunate the track looks broken. Your answer really scares me as our company will be upgrading all our hardware and software very shortly. The bad part is I have probably a dozen programs currently running under the current version of Access One is large and the others are small.
It's will be fun to see what happens when I have to convert them from 97 to I see fun and games coming down the road. I better have double back-up of everything before I proceed. Have a great week! Well it would be interesting to hear just how similar jjob 's symptoms are and if, by purging a copy of!
Otherwise, maybe ours is an isolated case? I think a lot will depend upon the quality of the database design and application code. The one we were converting is, er, far from perfect. It might be wise to flag the issue with your company NOW so at least you can say 'I told you so' when the thingy hits the rotary cooling device.
Though no point in spreading panic - it is only a risk rather than an inevitability. I'll let you know what they say.
I really don't expect any real answers as they probably haven't run into any problems yet. I wonder if Access has the same option to use a previous version as the default. We'll see. Take care, Richard.
0コメント